Appendix 2 – Risk Management
Vulnerability/Risk |
Trigger |
Consequences |
Current Rating |
Financial |
- Cost of management plan is significantly higher than expected - Investment of endowment or commuted sum does not generate sufficient income - Unable to secure commuted sum from Croudace |
Unable to meet requirements of LEMP / management plan Woodland deteriorates Land cannot be acquired |
Likelihood: 2 Impact: 2
Rating: 4 |
Accessibility |
- Encampments on site - Anti-social behaviour - Failure to maintain walkways - Unofficial access routes created - Poor management of roadway by managing agent |
Reduction in community use Woodland deteriorates Accident claims Encroachment
|
Likelihood:3 Impact:3
Rating: 9 |
Quality |
- Management plan is insufficient - Anti-social behaviour - Criminal behaviour - Environmental
|
Quality of woodland deteriorates Attracts littering / fly tipping Disease or destruction of woodland Negative reputational impact
|
Likelihood: 3 Impact:3
Rating: 9 |
No. |
Current Rating |
Target Rating |
Risk |
|||||
1 |
4 |
4 |
Financial
|
|||||
Control in place |
Adequacy of controls |
Required action/control |
Responsible Officer |
Success Factors |
Date for Review |
|||
Significant research and evaluation of costs has been completed. Management plan identified. Offer from Croudace received. Agreement that land will not be acquired without commuted sum. Financial investment discussed with Director of Finance and Business Transformation. |
Good |
Further negotiation with landowner |
Andrew Williams / Mark Green |
Land secured with commuted sum Management Plan in place |
Weekly throughout acquisition and transfer of land |
|||
No. |
Current Rating |
Target Rating |
Risk |
|||||
2 |
9 |
6 |
Accessibility |
|||||
Control in place |
Adequacy of controls |
Required action/control |
Responsible Officer |
Success Factors |
Date for Review |
|||
Land is already accessible with footpaths in place. Procedures in place to deal with illegal encampments and anti-social behaviour. |
Fair |
Active management of the site Appropriate signage Ongoing work to maintain footpaths and walkways
|
Andrew Williams |
Only official footpaths are used Community use of the woodland Good community engagement |
Monthly from acquisition |
|||
No. |
Current Rating |
Target Rating |
Risk |
|||||
3 |
9 |
6 |
Quality |
|||||
Control in place |
Adequacy of controls |
Required action/control |
Responsible Officer |
Success Factors |
Date for Review |
|||
Officers have good knowledge of land. Expertise in team about management of land. Policies and procedures in place for dealing with ASB. |
Fair |
Recruitment underway for technical officer with arboriculture expertise. Active management of site Engagement with local community to report issues |
Andrew Williams |
Community use of the woodland Low levels of ASB Productive woodland Low levels of disease |
Monthly |
|||