STRATEGIC PLANNING, SUSTAINABILITY AND TRANSPORT COMMITTEE |
8 November 2016 |
||||
Is the final decision on the recommendations in this report to be made at this meeting? |
Yes |
||||
|
|||||
Second Quarter Budget Monitoring 2016/17 |
|||||
|
|||||
Final Decision-Maker |
Strategic Planning, Sustainability and Transport Committee |
||||
Lead Head of Service |
Director of Finance and Business Improvement |
||||
Lead Officer and Report Author |
Ellie Dunnet Chief Accountant |
||||
Classification |
Public |
||||
Wards affected |
All |
||||
|
|
||||
This report makes the following recommendations to this Committee:
|
|||||
That the Committee n |
|||||
|
|
||||
This report relates to the following corporate priorities: |
|||||
The budget is a statement, in financial terms, of the priorities set out in the strategic plan. It reflects the Council’s decisions on the allocation of resources to all objectives of the strategic plan. The issues raised in this report identify areas where financial performance is at variance with priority outcomes. |
|||||
|
|
||||
Timetable |
|||||
Meeting |
Date |
||||
Strategic Planning, Sustainability and Transport Committee |
8 November 2016 |
||||
Policy & Resources Committee |
23 November 2016 |
||||
Second Quarter Budget Monitoring 2016/17 |
|
1. PURPOSE OF REPORT AND EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1.1 This report provides the Committee with an overview of the revenue budget and outturn for the second quarter of 2016/17, and highlights financial matters which may have a material impact on the medium term financial strategy or the balance sheet.
1.2 As at 30 September 2016, this committee was showing a minor overall favourable variance of £21,252, although there are significant adverse and favourable variances within this total. The individual variances for each service area are detailed at Appendix I.
1.3 The
position for the Borough Council as a whole at the end of the second quarter
shows an increase in the overspend forecast at the end of the first quarter.
Additional controls for the over spending
have been introduced introduced
to address this and are
detailed at paragraph 2.78 of
this report.
2. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND
2.1 The Director of Finance & Business Improvement is the Responsible Financial Officer and has overall responsibility for budgetary control and financial management. However, in practice, day to day budgetary control is delegated to Service Managers, with assistance and advice from their Director and the Finance section.
2.2 The medium term financial strategy for 2016/17 onwards was agreed by Council on 2 March 2016. This report advises and updates the Committee on the current position with regards to revenue expenditure against the approved budgets.
2.3 Attached at Appendix I is a table detailing the current budget and
expenditure position for this Committee’s services in relation to the second
quarter of 2016/17, to September 2016. The Appendix details the net budget per cost centre for this Committee, excluding capital charges. Actual expenditure is shown to the end of September 2016 and includes accruals for goods and services received but not yet paid for.
2.4 The columns of the table in the Appendix show the following detail:
a) The cost centre description;
b) The value of the total budget for the year;
c) The amount of the budget expected to be spent by the end of September 2016;
d) The actual spend to that date;
e) The variance between expected and actual spend;
f) The forecast spend to year end; and
g) The expected significant variances at 31 March 2017.
2.5 Appendix I shows that of an annual budget of -£738,780 there was an expectation that net income of -£252,180 would be achieved by the end of the second quarter. At this point in time, the budget position for this Committee as a whole is a minor underspend of £21,252. However, the full year forecast indicates that there is expected to be a net underspend of £110,000 by 31 March 2017.
2.6 Explanations for variances within individual cost centres which exceed or are expected to exceed £30,000 are provided below in accordance with the Council’s Constitution:
|
Positive Variance Q2 £000 |
Adverse Variance Q2 £000 |
Year end Forecast Variance £000 |
Strategic Planning, Sustainability and Transport Committee |
|
|
|
Pay & Display Car Parks –Lockmeadow and King Street car parks have significantly outperformed against their income targets, despite the increased income budgets which were set for 2016/17. This trend is expected to continue through to the end of 2016/17. It should be noted that the forecast incorporates a shortfall of £50,000 for Mote Park car park. This has been offset against the overall underspend in the forecast outturn. |
174 |
|
300 |
On-Street Parking – the surplus position in this area is expected to be maintained through to the year end. It should be noted that this surplus is ring-fenced. |
29 |
|
60 |
Development Management – there is an overspend on staff costs including agency staff which is not being met by current income levels. The Head of Service is aware of the problem and is exploring options for addressing the issue. These include the Planning Review that is being considered elsewhere on this meeting’s agenda. |
|
-187 |
-300 |
Building Regulations – income is currently above budget in this area, and the underspend is expected to continue through to the end of the year. It should be noted that this service is required to break even on a rolling three year basis.
|
39 |
|
50 |
Strategic Planning, Sustainability and Transport Total |
|
|
110 |
2.7 The overall forecast for the Council at the end of the second quarter is an increase in the overspend projected at the end of the first quarter, despite planned actions to address this. Increased control in the following areas of spending have therefore been introduced across the Council with immediate effect in order to improve the current position:
1. Recruitment;
2. Temporary staff;
3. Discretionary spending; and
4. Contractual commitments.
3 AVAILABLE OPTIONS
3.1 In considering the current position on the revenue budget at the end of
September 2016, the Committee can choose to note those actions and reconsider the outcomes at the end of the third quarter.
3.2 Alternatively, it could choose to take further action upon the consideration of the reported current position.
4 PREFERRED OPTION AND REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS
4.1 The Committee is requested to note the content of the report and agree on any necessary action to be taken [KJ1] in relation to the budget position.
5 CONSULTATION RESULTS AND PREVIOUS COMMITTEE FEEDBACK
5.1 This report is not expected to lead to any consultation.
6 NEXT STEPS: COMMUNICATION AND IMPLEMENTATION OF THE DECISION
6.1 The second quarter budget monitoring reports will be considered by the
Service Committees in November 2016, culminating in a full report to Policy and Resources Committee on 23 November.
6.2 Details of the actions taken by Service Committees to manage the pressures in their budgets will be reported to Policy and Resources Committee at this meeting.
7 CROSS-CUTTING ISSUES AND IMPLICATIONS
Issue |
Implications |
Sign-off |
Impact on Corporate Priorities |
This report monitors actual activity against the revenue budget and other financial matters set by Council for the financial year. The budget is set in accordance with the Council’s medium term financial strategy which is linked to the strategic plan and corporate priorities. |
Director of Finance & Business Improvement |
Risk Management |
The Council has produced a balanced budget for both capital and revenue expenditure and income for 2016/17 This budget is set against a backdrop of limited resources and an difficult economic climate. Regular and comprehensive monitoring of the type included in this report ensures early warning of significant issues that may place the Council at financial risk. This gives this committee the best opportunity to take actions to mitigate such risks. The issues set out in this report do not exhibit the level of potential risk identified in previous years. |
Director of Finance & Business Improvement |
Financial |
Financial implications are the focus of this report through high level budget monitoring. The process of budget monitoring ensures that services can react quickly to potential resource problems. The process ensures that the Council is not faced by corporate financial problems that may prejudice the delivery of strategic priorities. |
Director of Finance & Business Improvement |
Staffing |
The budget for staffing represents approximately 50% of the direct spend of the council and is carefully monitored. Any issues in relation to employee costs will be raised in this and future monitoring reports. |
Director of Finance & Business Improvement |
Legal |
The Council has a statutory obligation [KJ2] to maintain a balanced budget. This monitoring process enables the Committee to remain aware of issues and the process to be taken to maintain a balanced budget for the year. |
Kate Jardine, Team Leader (Planning), Mid Kent Legal Services |
Equality Impact Needs Assessment |
The budget ensures the focus of resources into areas of need as identified in the Council’s strategic priorities. This monitoring report ensures that the budget is delivering services to meet those needs. |
Director of Finance & Business Improvement |
Environmental/Sustainable Development |
No specific issues arise. |
Director of Finance & Business Improvement |
Community Safety |
No specific issues arise. |
Director of Finance & Business Improvement |
Human Rights Act |
No specific issues arise. |
Director of Finance & Business Improvement |
Procurement |
No specific issues arise. |
Director of Finance & Business Improvement |
Asset Management |
Resources available for asset management are contained within both revenue and capital budgets and do not represent a significant problem at this time. |
Director of Finance & Business Improvement |
8 REPORT APPENDICES
The following documents are to be published with this report and form part of the report:
· Appendix I: Second Quarter 2016/17 Revenue Monitoring – Strategic Planning, Sustainability and Transport
9 BACKGROUND PAPERS
None
[KJ1]This goes further than simply noting the report. If your “recommendation” is that they do not need to take any further action until the outcome of the third quarter (when you will presumably be reporting back to them?) then that needs to be set out.
[KJ2]Can you let me know the source please (I’m a planning lawyer!)