Surrenden Field, Staplehurst |
|
1. PURPOSE OF REPORT AND EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1.1 The
purpose of this report is for the Heritage Culture & Leisure Committee to
consider Staplehurst Parish Council’s (SPC) request for the land at Surrenden
Field, which is currently leased to them, to be extended on a longer term
arrangement.
1.2 This would require the land to formally be declared as surplus by Heritage, Culture & Leisure Committee, and a recommendation made to Policy and Resources Committee for a final decision.
2. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND
2.1 The freehold to
Surrenden Field in Staplehurst, as shown in APPENDIX 1, is held by Maidstone
Borough Council (MBC).
2.2 Currently the site
is leased to SPC. This lease is for a term of 21 years and expires on 1st
April 2019. SPC currently pay MBC a rent of £75 per annum.
2.3 The land is
protected by a restrictive covenant to be used only as an open space.
2.4 The current lease
is protected under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 and this means the Parish
Council have a right to a further lease on the same terms.
2.5 SPC have approached
officers to express that they would like to invest in the site to improve the drainage
and the play facilities, but before they can do this they would require long
tenure of the site and ideally would like the transfer of the freehold of the
site to them.
2.6 Surrenden Field is
highlighted in the Staplehurst Neighbourhood Plan 2015-2031 as being part of
the ‘Village Heart Policy’.
2.7 SPC would like
control of this site as it is important to the town and feel that by having the
freehold it would secure the site as green space for the future. If the
freehold is not available then the Parish have asked for a minimum of 125 year
lease.
2.8 A more appropriate
option may be to issue a lease to the SPC which will give them security of
tenure, enable them to invest in the site and give them added security that the
site will remain as green space in the future.
2.9 It has been
determined that an independent valuation under Section 123 of the Local
Government Act 1972 is not required as there is no alternative non-community
use for this site. The proposed disposal would only be at an ‘undervalue’ if it
was realistic to think that the Council could sell or lease the land for a
capital receipt or a higher rent. Given the land is protected by a restrictive
covenant to be only used as open space it is considered that an independent
valuation is not required.
2.10 The current lease will expire at the
end of the existing term unless it is surrendered by either of the two parties,
subject to the ability of both parties to renew the lease pursuant to the
provisions of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954.
3. AVAILABLE OPTIONS
3.1 MBC could issue a
further 21 year lease to the Parish Council on the same terms as the current
lease, as is their right under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954. This would be
on exactly the same terms as the current agreement. SPC have indicated that
this lease would not be long enough to allow them to carry out the proposed
improvement works to the site.
3.2 MBC could issue a
125 year lease to SPC. This is the recommended option with the reasons shown
below in section 4.
3.3 The freehold for
Surrenden Field could be handed over to the Parish Council. Passing the
freehold of the site to the SPC is not considered appropriate as this would
transfer control of the site. Whilst MBC has no long term plans for the site it
is not felt that it would be prudent to pass control of a council asset to a
third party.
3.4 MBC could take the
site back when the current lease ends and manage it in the future.
This is not considered appropriate as the maintenance of the site would be
passed to MBC. It would also take away the ability for SPC to invest in
improvement of the site.
3.5 The current lease
could be left in place until it runs out on 1st April 2019, and then
a new lease on the same terms would have to be granted to the Parish Council,
unless MBC had specific grounds under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 to deny
such a request.
This is not recommended as SPC require a longer lease of the site to enable
them to carry out improvement works. SPC may not be in a position to carry out
these works in the future.
4. PREFERRED OPTION AND REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS
4.1 The preferred
option is option 3.2, shown above, that ‘MBC could issue a 125 year lease to
SPC’.
4.2 This would give SPC
long term security of tenure, which would enable them to invest in the site with
the security of knowing that the site will remain as green space in the future.
4.3 If a new lease is to be issued to SPC then Heritage, Culture & Leisure Committee would need to declare the land as surplus and authorise the placing of a Public Notice pursuant of Section 123 of the Local Government Act 1972 in respect of the open space.
4.4 Objections and representations which might be received in response to the advertisement should be considered by the Heritage, Culture and Leisure Committee before making a recommendation to dispose of the land to the Policy and Resources Committee
4.5 Should no objections or representations be received in response to the advertisement, the matter would be referred to Policy and Resources Committee for a final decision concerning the disposal of the parcel of land and for the Heads of Terms of the lease to be agreed.
5. CONSULTATION RESULTS AND PREVIOUS COMMITTEE FEEDBACK
5.1 This subject has not been consulted on with the public and this is the first time that this has been brought to Heritage, Culture & Leisure Committee.
6. NEXT STEPS: COMMUNICATION AND IMPLEMENTATION OF THE DECISION
6.1 If Heritage, Culture & Leisure Committee recommends the issue of a long lease of Surrenden Field to SPC then the disposal of the land will be advertised pursuant of Section 123 of the Local Government Act 1972.
7. CROSS-CUTTING ISSUES AND IMPLICATIONS
Issue |
Implications |
Sign-off |
Impact on Corporate Priorities |
Keeping Maidstone Borough an attractive place for all – This playing field is important to Staplehurst and makes the area attractive |
Parks & Leisure Manager |
Risk Management |
No impact |
|
Financial |
It is proposed that a pepper corn rent be charged to SPC for the lease of this land. |
Section 151 Officer & Finance Team |
Staffing |
No impact |
|
Legal |
Protection of the Council’s ability to regain control of the Premises with the necessary provisions in the lease. The requirement for the Council to obtain best consideration for the disposal pursuant to s123 LGA. |
Legal Team |
Equality Impact Needs Assessment |
No Impact |
|
Environmental/Sustainable Development |
The land is already protected by covenants. |
Parks & Leisure Manager |
Community Safety |
No impact |
|
Human Rights Act |
No impact |
|
Procurement |
No impact |
|
Asset Management |
There will effectively be no asset management considerations as the land will be managed by SPC for the long term, but it does remove obligations from MBC for any active asset management. |
Head of Service & Manager |
8. REPORT APPENDICES
The following documents are to be published with this report and form part of the report:
· Appendix I: Surrenden Field Staplehurst with boundary shown in red
9. BACKGROUND PAPERS
None