ANNUAL COUNCIL MEETING |
19 May 2018 |
|||
|
||||
REVIEW OF ALLOCATION OF SEATS ON COMMITTEES |
||||
|
||||
Final Decision-Maker |
Council |
|||
Lead Head of Service |
Angela Woodhouse, Head of Policy, Communications and Governance
|
|||
Lead Officer and Report Author |
Sam Bailey, Democratic and Administration Services Manager Debbie Snook, Democratic Services Officer
|
|||
Classification |
Public
|
|||
Wards affected |
All |
|||
|
||||
Executive Summary |
||||
Following the Borough Council elections on 3 May 2018, a review has been undertaken of the allocation of seats on Committees. The Council is asked to agree that the allocation of seats on Committees be as set out in Appendix 1 to this report.
|
||||
|
||||
This report makes the following recommendation to Council: |
||||
1. That the allocation of seats on Committees be as set out in Appendix 1 to this report. |
||||
|
|
|||
Timetable |
||||
Meeting |
Date |
|||
Annual Council Meeting |
19 May 2018 |
|||
REVIEW OF ALLOCATION OF SEATS ON COMMITTEES |
|
1. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND
1.1 The Council has a statutory requirement under the Local Government and Housing Act 1989 to ensure political proportionality in the membership of Committees. Following the Borough Council elections on 3 May 2018, the composition of the Council is as follows:
Conservative Party |
25 |
Liberal Democrat |
20 |
The Independent Group |
4 |
Labour Party |
3 |
Independent Maidstone |
2 |
Independent (Cllr R Webb) |
1 |
Total |
55 |
2. AVAILABLE OPTIONS
2.1 The allocation of seats on individual Committees which now achieves overall political balance is set out in Appendix 1.
2.2 Section 17 of the Local Government and Housing Act 1989 provides for exceptions to the political balance requirements. Essentially, the Council can amend the political balance of a Committee provided that notice of the intention to give such consideration has been given to all Members of the Council and that when the alternative arrangements are put to the vote at the Council meeting, no Member of the Council votes against them.
3 PREFERRED OPTION AND REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS
3.1 It is proposed that the Employment Committee and the Urgency Committee are not politically balanced, as, in accordance with the Council’s Constitution, the membership of these Committees must include the Leaders of the five largest Political Groups represented on the Council, and that the allocation of seats on individual Committees, which achieves overall political balance, be as set out in Appendix 1.
4. RISK
4.1 The review of the allocation of seats on Committees will ensure an appropriate political balance in membership of Committees.
5. CONSULTATION RESULTS AND PREVIOUS COMMITTEE FEEDBACK
5.1 Group Leaders have been consulted on the allocation of seats on Committees and the adjustments required.
6. NEXT STEPS: COMMUNICATION AND IMPLEMENTATION OF THE DECISION
6.1 Once the allocation of seats has been decided upon, there is a duty to give effect to the allocation by making appointments to them in accordance with the wishes of the Group Leaders on behalf of their respective Political Groups.
7. CROSS-CUTTING ISSUES AND IMPLICATIONS
Issue |
Implications |
Sign-off |
Impact on Corporate Priorities |
There are no direct impacts on corporate priorities arising from this, but the Committees when in place discharge the functions delegated to them having regard where appropriate to the Council’s strategic objectives. |
Head of Policy, Communications and Governance |
Risk Management |
See section 4 above. |
Head of Policy, Communications and Governance |
Financial |
The Committees appointed having regard to the political balance requirements form part of the original plan for the committee system of governance and as such there are no additional financial implications. |
Section 151 Officer |
Staffing |
There are no staffing implications |
Head of Policy, Communications and Governance |
Legal |
The legal implications are set out in the body of the report. |
Legal Team |
Privacy and Data Protection |
No specific issues arise. |
Legal Team |
Equalities |
The review will ensure an equitable political representation in membership of Committees. |
Equalities and Corporate Policy Officer |
Crime and Disorder |
No specific issues arise.
|
Head of Policy, Communications and Governance
|
Procurement |
No specific issues arise.
|
Head of Policy, Communications and Governance |
8. REPORT APPENDICES
· Appendix 1: Review of Allocation of Seats on Committees
9. BACKGROUND PAPERS
None